vendredi 19 juin 2015

Approaches To Cost Segregation Depreciation

By Freida Michael


Depreciation is loss in value of a fixed asset such as motor vehicle, machinery, office equipment and computers if any. This is a practice defining an asset and identifying its cost, then grouping the asset according to their similarities for tax purposes. Cost segregation depreciation has many benefits to an individual or a firm due to it tax implication.

For tax purposes, study on outlay segregation will involve reallocating the entire charge of an asset to suitable classes to help you calculate depreciation deductions. Depreciation is a charge which is reflected on the income statement and it reduces profit.

Since depreciation reduces a firm profit, it then also reduces the taxable amount of a business. The criteria used to apportion total expenditure of project to different assets very important as it helps to achieve accurate expenditure separation study.

The frequently used techniques for segregation of outlay include detailed engineering technique which is based from initial expenditure records, letter approach also known as survey technique, residue estimation method and finally modeling or sampling method.

The next stage is verifying the nature of the asset and evaluating its intended purpose. Sometimes it may require the auditor to take photos of the project for reference in the future if need be. Also photos of site previously constructed may be required for verification purposes and to monitor construction progress.

The detailed engineering technique has few vital steps that professionals ought to follow to achieve reliable and accurate results. The technique takes expenditure of that period of construction into consideration by using outlay records relating to the asset in coming up with amount to be depreciated.

Some firms can also use straight line method or reducing balance methods of depreciating an asset. The straight line basis takes the initial value of a property, removes any residual or scraps value from the initial outlay and then apportions the resultant amount to the useful years of the property.

This method entails following activities, first the management is supposed to identify certain properties or asset which will be analyzed. Then get all the files and records containing the charge of the asset and authenticate project total outlay.

The next step is reviewing the asset to verify nature and its desired purpose or use. For reference purposes take photos some specific assets. An auditor can also request photographs of previous sites to verify the progress of construction and the status of asset before the construction began.

Thoroughly counter checking of blueprints, contracts, documents for bid, payment request from suppliers and specifications for verification. Prepare take offs quantitatively for the entire material used in construction and utilize records for payments to calculate unit costs. Recognize and allocate specific items from the project to their respective classes such as buildings, land, equipment, fixtures and fittings and other non current assets.

The approach also fails to reconcile the project actual cost with the quantitative value. It is an unreasonable approach to use since a proper approach will add back residual cost to the total cost of short term asset.




About the Author:



Aucun commentaire:

Enregistrer un commentaire