On the surface, it doesn't seem like there is much of any difference between "fanbases" and "audiences." After all, the both of them entail groups of people that are interested in one form of media over another, which is a point that cannot be argued against. With that said, though, there seems to be differences, if a recent article about YouTube is anything to go by. It might signal a shift in terms of how viewers are appealed to but will Internet marketing companies agree with such a point?
The Guardian posted an article about YouTube and how it is stressing the point of building "fanbases" - not audiences - to its many users. The reason that YouTube gave was that fanbases are more likely to choose what it is that they will watch, at the times that they would like. Audiences, though, seem to tune in to watch whenever they are told. It's easy to assume that fanbases have a more positive connotation, not just in the realm of social media but content creation as well.
For example, I am a regular user on Tumblr and I will often see people live-blogging during television shows, commenting on events that deserve to have attention brought to them. What they are able to do, as a result, is create content. They can write commentary and perhaps even record their own videos that they can then post on the site in question. The show does not stop the moment that the credits roll; if anything, the show will only stop when the fans demand it, as Internet marketing companies may attest to.
One of the many points that the article brought to my mind, though, was that videos will be geared to people based on what it is that they are interested in. Someone who enjoys funny videos might not want to have that form of media forced upon him or her, as Internet marketing companies can agree that such an endeavor can come across as rather intrusive. Instead, organic involvement is required, according to reputable firms such as fishbat. To say the least, the natural engagement associated with content is integral.
The goal of this movement, by YouTube, should be to have the distribution of videos brought so that it has a far wider reach. With that said, I think that it is important to consider that not everyone is going to click on links in order to watch certain videos. Even though people might have similar interests, to say that they enjoy all of the same things is a stretch, to put it simply. With that said, I can only hope that this "fanbases" over "audiences" movement by YouTube can actually produce more engaging results.
The Guardian posted an article about YouTube and how it is stressing the point of building "fanbases" - not audiences - to its many users. The reason that YouTube gave was that fanbases are more likely to choose what it is that they will watch, at the times that they would like. Audiences, though, seem to tune in to watch whenever they are told. It's easy to assume that fanbases have a more positive connotation, not just in the realm of social media but content creation as well.
For example, I am a regular user on Tumblr and I will often see people live-blogging during television shows, commenting on events that deserve to have attention brought to them. What they are able to do, as a result, is create content. They can write commentary and perhaps even record their own videos that they can then post on the site in question. The show does not stop the moment that the credits roll; if anything, the show will only stop when the fans demand it, as Internet marketing companies may attest to.
One of the many points that the article brought to my mind, though, was that videos will be geared to people based on what it is that they are interested in. Someone who enjoys funny videos might not want to have that form of media forced upon him or her, as Internet marketing companies can agree that such an endeavor can come across as rather intrusive. Instead, organic involvement is required, according to reputable firms such as fishbat. To say the least, the natural engagement associated with content is integral.
The goal of this movement, by YouTube, should be to have the distribution of videos brought so that it has a far wider reach. With that said, I think that it is important to consider that not everyone is going to click on links in order to watch certain videos. Even though people might have similar interests, to say that they enjoy all of the same things is a stretch, to put it simply. With that said, I can only hope that this "fanbases" over "audiences" movement by YouTube can actually produce more engaging results.
About the Author:
For more specifics about how Internet marketing companies can assist your company in the long run, contact fishbat today.. This article, Can Internet Marketing Companies Look At Audiences And Fanbases? is available for free reprint.
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire